After a long highway drive, you'll truly understand the significant difference between a "1.5T engine" and a "2.0L engin

When attempting to overtake, pressing the accelerator pedal firmly would elicit a strained roar from the engine. Although the turbocharger was working hard, the power response remained noticeably delayed, resulting in a sluggish acceleration process that gradually dampened the urgency to quickly pass vehicles ahead. This was particularly evident during long uphill sections, where the 1.5T engine clearly struggled. The vehicle's speed would drop significantly, requiring frequent downshifting to maintain momentum, making the driving experience quite demanding.

After completing the first leg of the journey, the driver switched to a vehicle equipped with a 2.0L engine. Upon re-entering the highway, the difference was immediately apparent. With a light press on the accelerator, the vehicle responded promptly, delivering linear and robust power output. When overtaking, only moderate throttle input was needed for the engine to provide ample power, allowing the car to effortlessly pass other vehicles with smooth and confident execution. Even when tackling the same uphill sections, the 2.0L engine maintained steady power delivery without frequent downshifting, enabling the vehicle to consistently hold the desired speed.

Beyond the differences in power performance, the two engine types also exhibited distinct characteristics in fuel efficiency. Theoretically, the 1.5T engine, with its smaller displacement, may offer better fuel economy in congested urban conditions. However, during highway driving, maintaining adequate power often requires higher engine RPMs, resulting in fuel consumption that is not significantly lower than that of the 2.0L engine. In contrast, the 2.0L engine demonstrated relatively high combustion efficiency and impressive fuel economy while cruising at steady speeds on the highway.